High Court grants Zahid discharge not amounting to acquittal in YAB case


KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) against deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi for all 47 graft charges involving Yayasan Akalbudi funds.

Justice Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah in his judgement said the extended time needed for investigation was justifiable as the representations submitted by the defence had taken up hundreds of pages for examinations by the prosecution.

“It is therefore justified for the prosecution to examine these representations which also involved talking statements from various individuals,” he said on Monday (Sept 4).

Earlier, the prosecution has applied for Ahmad Zahid to be discharged but not acquitted as further investigations are still needed for the case.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar listed 11 reasons for it; these include ensuring no miscarriage of justice is committed and to make way for more comprehensive investigations by the authorities.

He also said the defence had submitted several representations to the Attorney-General's Chambers on Dec 8 last year and Jan 25; and again on Feb 28 and March 7.

Mohd Dusuki also said the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is still investigating the case after Ahmad Zahid made representations.

He also said the DNAA is in view of the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) formed to look into claims in former attorney-general Tommy Thomas’ controversial memoir, particularly on alleged selective prosecution.

Ahmad Zahid’s counsel Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik argued for a full discharge instead, saying that further delay would be unfair for his client.

Hisyam Teh argued there was no timeline set on the conclusion of the investigation by the MACC as well as the setting up and conclusion of the RCI.

Justice Sequerah in his judgement added that the court is placing the DNAA order as the case has been ongoing for 77 days involving 99 prosecution witnesses and 15 defence witnesses had come forward.

He said the powers exercised by the AGC under the Article 145 of the Federal Constitution and Section 254 of the Criminal Procedure Code to destitute or withdraw charges at any time before judgement is unquestioned.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

KKB polls: Kuala Kubu Baharu voters go to the polls tomorrow
Teen biker killed, pillion rider hurt in collision in Johor
All about EPF’s Account 3
Taiwanese superstars scale Mt Kinabalu
Time needed to revamp system, say experts
Only UN sanctions recognised
Expert: Upgrades needed to become regional research hub
Cops get fingerprints, but no new suspects in acid attack
Wee: Avoid burdening the people
Big potential for clinical research

Others Also Read